Simpson’s Rule and procedures

3 minutes, 2 seconds Read

Simpson’s Rule

by M. Bourne

Interactive exploration

See an applet where you can explore Simpson’s Rule and other numerical techniques:
Riemann Sums Applet

In the last section, Trapezoidal Rule, we used straight lines to model a curve and learned that it was an improvement over using rectangles for finding areas under curves because we had much less “missing” from each segment.
We seek an even better approximation for the area under a curve.
In Simpson’s Rule, we will use parabolas to approximate each part of the curve. This proves to be very efficient since it’s generally more accurate than the other numerical methods we’ve seen. (See more about Parabolas.)
Simpson's Rule explanation
We divide the area into displaystyle{n} equal segments of width displaystyleDelta{x}. The approximate area is given by the following.

Simpson’s Rule

Area displaystyle={int_{{a}}^{{b}}} f{{left({x}right)}}{left.{d}{x}right.}

displaystyleapproxfrac{{Delta{x}}}{{3}}{left({y}_{{0}}+{4}{y}_{{1}}+{2}{y}_{{2}}+{4}{y}_{{3}}+{2}{y}_{{4}}+right.} displaystyle{left.ldots+{4}{y}_{{{n}-{1}}}+{y}_{{n}}right)}

where displaystyleDelta{x}=frac{{{b}-{a}}}{{n}}

Note: In Simpson’s Rule, n must be EVEN.
See below how we obtain Simpson’s Rule by finding the area under each parabola and adding the areas.

Memory aid

We can re-write Simpson’s Rule by grouping it as follows:
displaystyle{int_{{a}}^{{b}}} f{{left({x}right)}}{left.{d}{x}right.} displaystyleapproxfrac{{Delta{x}}}{{3}}{left[{y}_{{0}}+{4}{left({y}_{{1}}+{y}_{{3}}+{y}_{{5}}+ldotsright)}right.} displaystyle{left.+{2}{left({y}_{{2}}+{y}_{{4}}+{y}_{{6}}+ldotsright)}+{y}_{{n}}right]}
This gives us an easy way to remember Simpson’s Rule:
displaystyle{int_{{a}}^{{b}}} f{{left({x}right)}}{left.{d}{x}right.} displaystyleapproxfrac{{Delta{x}}}{{3}}{left[text{FIRST}+{4}{left(text{sum of ODDs}right)}right.} displaystyle{left.+{2}{left(text{sum of EVENs}right)}+text{LAST}right]}
Example using Simpson’s Rule
Approximate displaystyle{int_{{2}}^{{3}}}frac{{{left.{d}{x}right.}}}{{{x}+{1}}} using Simpson’s Rule with displaystyle{n}={4}.

We haven’t seen how to integrate this using algebraic processes yet, but we can use Simpson’s Rule to get a good approximation for the value.
Here is the situation.
area under 1/(x+1)
displaystyleDelta{x}=frac{{{b}-{a}}}{{n}}=frac{{{3}-{2}}}{{4}}={0.25}
displaystyle{y}_{{0}}= f{{left({a}right)}}
displaystyle= f{{left({2}right)}}
displaystyle=frac{1}{{{2}+{1}}}={0.3333333}
displaystyle{y}_{{1}}= f{{left({a}+Delta{x}right)}}= f{{left({2.25}right)}} displaystyle=frac{1}{{{2.25}+{1}}}={0.3076923}
displaystyle{y}_{{2}}= f{{left({a}+{2}Delta{x}right)}}= f{{left({2.5}right)}} displaystyle=frac{1}{{{2.5}+{1}}}={0.2857142}
displaystyle{y}_{{3}}= f{{left({a}+{3}Delta{x}right)}}= f{{left({2.75}right)}} displaystyle=frac{1}{{{2.75}+{1}}}={0.2666667}
displaystyle{y}_{{4}}= f{{left({b}right)}}= f{{left({3}right)}} displaystyle=frac{1}{{{3}+{1}}}={0.25}
So
Area displaystyle={int_{{a}}^{{b}}} f{{left({x}right)}}text{d}{x}
displaystyleapproxfrac{0.25}{{3}}{left({0.333333}+{4}{left({0.3076923}right)}right.} displaystyle+{2}{left({0.2857142}right)}+{4}{left({0.2666667}right)} displaystyle{left.+{0.25}right)}

displaystyle={0.2876831}

Notes

1. The actual answer to this problem is 0.287682 (to 6 decimal places) so our Simpson’s Rule approximation has an error of only 0.00036%.
2. In this example, the curve is very nearly parabolic, so the 2 parabolas shown above practically merge with the curve displaystyle{y}=frac{1}{{{x}+{1}}}.
google-site-verification=2j8Us0psP3GGjD12h0fH6_Z08_sRyWQjNbWcaMV4E9A

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *